From Politiko: Intelligence reports that are publicized but not backed by sufficient evidence could end up doing more harm than good, Sen. Panfilo Lacson said.
Hilaw pa eh: Ping says intel reports without evidence need no exposure
May 1, 2018
Intelligence reports that are publicized but not backed by sufficient evidence could end up doing more harm than good, Sen. Panfilo Lacson said Tuesday.
Lacson, a former Philippine National Police chief, said only evidence that is enough to file a criminal case can validate an intelligence report.
He added making the contents of an intelligence report public prematurely may either tip off or humiliate the subject of the report.
“Only sufficient evidence that merits the filing of a criminal case can validate an intelligence report. In fact, the purpose an intelligence report is to discreetly build up a case against the subject of such report, not forewarn or publicly humiliate him,” Lacson, who headed the PNP from 1999 to 2001, said in a tweet.
Lacson’s tweet came a day after the Philippine Drug Enforcement Agency released the names of 207 barangay officials believed involved in the illegal drug trade.
In a tweet, the PDEA said the list includes 90 barangay captains and 117 barangay council members.
The PDEA Director General Aaron Aquino, releases the names of 207 barangay officials involved in the illegal drug trade among the barangay officials, 90 are barangay captains and 117 are officers of the barangay council. #PDEATopStories #NarcoList pic.twitter.com/RWILCMXpWH
— PDEA (@PdeaTopStories) April 30, 2018
The PDEA’s disclosure comes two weeks ahead of the May 14 barangay and Sangguniang Kabataan elections.