Tag: Speaker Gloria Arroyo

Interview at the #MeetInquirer multimedia forum | Aug. 16, 2018

At the #MeetInquirer multimedia forum, Sen. Lacson answered questions on:
– ‘Hybrid’ budget
– National ID
– President Duterte’s reported thinking of stepping down
– Addressing the problems at BOC
– Pork barrel system
– PDEA’s need to refocus anti-drug strategy
– Sen. Tito Sotto as Senate President
– Political scene 2022

* video courtesy Inquirer.net Facebook page

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Quotes from the interview…Β  Continue reading “Interview at the #MeetInquirer multimedia forum | Aug. 16, 2018”

πŸ“° Back to β€˜happy pork barrel days’ if proposed P3.757-T GAA not checked β€” Lacson [Manila Bulletin]

photo1121-004

From the Manila Bulletin:Β β€˜β€™If not checked, we will be back to the happy β€˜pork barrel’ days of legislators in spite of the Supreme Court ruling outlawing the same,’’ Lacson said.Β  Continue reading “πŸ“° Back to β€˜happy pork barrel days’ if proposed P3.757-T GAA not checked β€” Lacson [Manila Bulletin]”

Guarding Against ‘Pork’ in the 2019 Budget

With the policy statement issued by Speaker Arroyo concerning all the congressmen’s earmarks for their respective districts, expect a massive mangling of the National Expenditure Program (NEP).

If not checked, we will be back to the happy ‘pork barrel’ days of legislators in spite of the Supreme Court ruling outlawing the same.

Worse, all the planning involved in the preparation of the national budget will be rendered inutile to the detriment of the medium development plan of the national government, as well as the local development plans submitted by the local government units (LGUs).

I hope some like-minded colleagues in the Senate will also work overtime, as I am determined to do, in scrutinizing the House version of the appropriations bill to expose and slice whatever β€œpork” there is in whatever form and no matter how deeply hidden, with the end in view of preventing the return of this malevolent practice now declared unconstitutional with finality by the Supreme Court.

*****