Facebook: @PingLacsonOfficial
X/Twitter: @IamPingLacson
Instagram: @IamPingLacson
Threads: @IamPingLacson
YouTube: @IamPingLacson
Telegram: @UsaPingLacson
Viber: 🔍Ping Lacson Channel
PING LACSON on X
Read Sen. Ping Lacson’s latest public posts on X:
One very comforting thing about the differing legal opinions of the ‘amici curiae’ yesterday is that – we are absolutely sure, no one in his right mind can ascribe bad motive or political pressure to any one of them.
— PING LACSON (@iampinglacson) September 17, 2026
Mula law enforcement hanggang Senado, napakababa ng tolerance ko sa mga corrupt. I am always consistent in this regard. Talagang hindi ko sila tatantanan.
— PING LACSON (@iampinglacson) September 17, 2026
Engaging in open court with three of the Court’s most esteemed former justices (including two former Chief Justices) was an unforgettable experience. Concepts like ‘textual vs. contextual,’ ‘truth and fairness,’ and ‘all means all’ certainly left an indelible mark on my mind and…
— PING LACSON (@iampinglacson) September 17, 2026
Lacson: Consistent in Low Tolerance for Corruption, Will Keep Hounding the Corrupt
Sen. Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson has maintained a consistently low tolerance for corruption throughout his public service – and will not let up in hounding the corrupt.
Lacson reiterated this Thursday as he continues to flag irregularities in the proposed 2027 budget measure, along with corruption behind “ghost” flood control and other infrastructure projects.
In Filipino: Lacson: Mababa Pa Rin ang Tolerance sa Korapsyon, Hindi Tatantanan ang mga Korap
Lacson: Former SC Justices’ Insights Leave ‘Indelible Mark,’ to Guide Decision on Voting Threshold
The insights shared by three former Supreme Court Justices during their appearance before the Impeachment Court Wednesday left an “indelible” mark on Senator-Judge Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson and will help guide his decision when the Court votes next week on the disputed voting threshold for conviction.
Lacson said Thursday that he learned much from retired Chief Justice Reynato Puno’s discussion of “textual vs. contextual” interpretation, retired Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban’s emphasis on “truth and fairness,” and retired Associate Justice Adolfo Azcuna’s interpretation of the phrase “all means all” in determining the threshold.
In Filipino: Lacson: Pananaw ng mga Dating SC Justice, Tumatak at Gagabay sa Desisyon sa Voting Threshold
Lacson Raises Fairness Issue If 9 Senator-Judges Cannot Attend
Senator-Judge Panfilo “Ping” M. Lacson on Wednesday asked former Supreme Court justices how the Impeachment Court can ensure fairness to the Filipino people, as emphasized by former Chief Justice Artemio Panganiban in his preliminary remarks and which, along with truth, should be an important basis for the impeachment court’s decision – if nine of its 24 members are unable to attend, leaving only 15 senator-judges, one short of the 16 votes that represent two-thirds of all Senate members required for conviction under the Constitution.
Lacson said the current situation of the Impeachment Court, with two senator-judges detained, one abroad, and one in hiding, is a novel one that framers of the 1987 Constitution may not have anticipated when they set the two-thirds requirement for conviction.
In Filipino: Lacson, Itinanong sa Amici Curiae Kung Paano Matiyak ang Katarungan Kung Hindi Makadadalo ang 9 Senator-Judges
Continue reading “Lacson Raises Fairness Issue If 9 Senator-Judges Cannot Attend”